Feature Writer: Brother Joh Paul
Feature Title: Religion and the Fetishism
Link: No longer available
Religion and the Fetishism
The French writer Charles de Brasses in the Century XVIII used the concept of—Fetishism—to apply the theory of evolution to religion, in which, Brosses suggested that the—Fetishism—was the most primitive state of religion, followed by state of Polytheism and Monotheism, representing a progressive abstraction of thought.
In the Century XIX, anthropologists and scholars of comparative Religion as Edward Burnett Tylor and John Ferguson McLennan, developed the theories of animism and totemism to clarify the—Fetishism.
Fetishism in General
It is the devotion to material objects, which has been called fetishes (in my personal case—the penis). Fetishism is a form of religious belief or practice in which certain objects are considered to possess magical powers or supernatural and which protect the wearer or those of natural forces. The amulets are also considered fetishes.
Sexual Fetishism
Fetishism (Latin facticius, artificial and Portuguese feitiço, “Spell”. “Magic”, “Mania”, the French “fetish”) is a Paraphilia. It consists of erotic arousal and facilitation or attainment of orgasm through a talisman or fetish object (penis), substance (semen, pre-semen, piss) or body part (crotch) in particular.
Paraphilia is the extreme degree of fetishism. Whilst the fetish adds more pleasure to the act, being able to dispense with this, the element of paraphilia must be present at the event, that is definitely for pleasure, if intercourse does not contain this ingredient is not achieved any pleasure.
A paraphilia—Greek παρά, Para: outside and φιλία, philia, love—is a pattern of sexual behavior in which the predominant source of pleasure is not in mating, but something else or activity that accompanies it.
Usually, though not necessarily happen mainly because the person who practices and has had a very high amount of sexual pleasure, there comes a time when little not satisfied and wants more and more of that activity to experience orgasm or arousal. However, behavior considered—paraphilic—depends on the prevailing social conventions at a time and place.
For example, until the mid twentieth century is—by the fifties and sixties—oral sex and masturbation were considered paraphilias, but now no longer considered as such—If the subject’s activity is not limited only to them. More common paraphilias are: sadism, masochism, exhibitionism, voyeurism, bestiality, coprophilia, necrophilia, fetishism and frotismo.
In the present case, for me, the worship of the Phallus goes beyond a fetish. Personally, I could not conceiving a sexual relationship with a person who has no penis. Although a man, not enough that he was born genetically male, but must be the bearer of a penis, which must be beautiful, big, heavy and turgid.
Hair as a sign of masculinity are also an important ingredient in the prospectus to consider; although the canons of beauty change day by day, the man even shaving or plucking of the fur conserving traits that will make it visible so a few days of being removed. This sign give prominence to his masculinity in my view.
Having said all this I conclude that pornography as an aid to achieving a degree of sexual arousal is always very nice welcome, but should never be the routine replacement for a real sexual encounter.
The devotion to the phallus is himself or someone else should always be in communion.
If the sexual partner is a top, there will be always a bottom, wanting serve and worship our own phallus. Needless to say, the inclination to worship the phallus is always a good things, it is also a very pleasant experience being able to share the worship of a phallus determined. Feeling the process increased minute to achieve an orgasm jackpot abundant and prolific.